<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 216 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69430</link>
    <description>Valuation of Tata Tea Ltd. shares for capital gains was directed at face value of Rs. 147 per share, following a Madras High Court judgment. Expenditure on advertisement inviting deposits was treated as revenue expenditure. Depreciation on Bio-Gas Generating Systems was allowed, emphasizing genuine transactions. Depreciation claims on various assets were upheld except for Rolling Mills Rolls, remanded for verification. Guest house expenses were disallowed, and research fee expenses were remanded for reconsideration due to procedural violations. ITA Nos. 120, 121, and 122/Mds./99 were dismissed, while ITA Nos. 119 and 123/Mds./99 were partly allowed, with specific issues remanded for further verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 14:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 216 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69430</link>
      <description>Valuation of Tata Tea Ltd. shares for capital gains was directed at face value of Rs. 147 per share, following a Madras High Court judgment. Expenditure on advertisement inviting deposits was treated as revenue expenditure. Depreciation on Bio-Gas Generating Systems was allowed, emphasizing genuine transactions. Depreciation claims on various assets were upheld except for Rolling Mills Rolls, remanded for verification. Guest house expenses were disallowed, and research fee expenses were remanded for reconsideration due to procedural violations. ITA Nos. 120, 121, and 122/Mds./99 were dismissed, while ITA Nos. 119 and 123/Mds./99 were partly allowed, with specific issues remanded for further verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>