<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 139 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69427</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s order under section 263, dismissing the appeal. It confirmed that the loss on revaluation of investments and the provision for doubtful debts should be added back to the book profits under section 115J. The Tribunal found the assessee&#039;s claims to be an attempt to avoid tax, not allowable under the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 17:06:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107797" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 139 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69427</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s order under section 263, dismissing the appeal. It confirmed that the loss on revaluation of investments and the provision for doubtful debts should be added back to the book profits under section 115J. The Tribunal found the assessee&#039;s claims to be an attempt to avoid tax, not allowable under the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>