<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 172 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69424</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, upholding the addition of Rs. 1,02,000 under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to prove the source of investment adequately and did not provide satisfactory explanations for the nature and sources of the investments, leading to the confirmation of the addition by the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 17:00:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 172 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69424</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, upholding the addition of Rs. 1,02,000 under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to prove the source of investment adequately and did not provide satisfactory explanations for the nature and sources of the investments, leading to the confirmation of the addition by the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>