<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (3) TMI 145 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69408</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed three appeals by the assessee, overturning the disallowance of provisions for purchase tax liability on sea foods for assessment years 1981-82, 1982-83, and 1983-84. The Tribunal held that the provision for purchase tax was allowable as a deduction due to ongoing assessments, reasonable apprehension of liability, and similarity to previous cases where such deductions were permitted. The decision favored the assessee&#039;s position, considering the pending final assessments by sales-tax authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 16:01:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (3) TMI 145 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69408</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed three appeals by the assessee, overturning the disallowance of provisions for purchase tax liability on sea foods for assessment years 1981-82, 1982-83, and 1983-84. The Tribunal held that the provision for purchase tax was allowable as a deduction due to ongoing assessments, reasonable apprehension of liability, and similarity to previous cases where such deductions were permitted. The decision favored the assessee&#039;s position, considering the pending final assessments by sales-tax authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>