<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (6) TMI 121 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69398</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 271B of the Income Tax Act, noting the need for further inquiries to determine if the delay in completing the audit was justified. The Income Tax Officer may re-examine the case and issue a fresh show-cause notice if any default is found. The appeal is treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 15:36:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (6) TMI 121 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69398</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 271B of the Income Tax Act, noting the need for further inquiries to determine if the delay in completing the audit was justified. The Income Tax Officer may re-examine the case and issue a fresh show-cause notice if any default is found. The appeal is treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>