<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (12) TMI 91 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69390</link>
    <description>For capital gains computation on shares received in amalgamation, Section 49(2) was read with Section 55(2)(i) so that, where the underlying amalgamating-company shares were held before 1 January 1964, the assessee could opt for their fair market value on that date as the cost of acquisition. The Tribunal also held that the Revenue&#039;s additional ground on that valuation issue could be entertained as a pure question of law on the existing record. On share valuation, 6 per cent was the proper capitalisation rate for the relevant date, and the average of yield value and break-up value could not be used. A separate deduction for bonus-shares cost was disallowed on the facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (12) TMI 91 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69390</link>
      <description>For capital gains computation on shares received in amalgamation, Section 49(2) was read with Section 55(2)(i) so that, where the underlying amalgamating-company shares were held before 1 January 1964, the assessee could opt for their fair market value on that date as the cost of acquisition. The Tribunal also held that the Revenue&#039;s additional ground on that valuation issue could be entertained as a pure question of law on the existing record. On share valuation, 6 per cent was the proper capitalisation rate for the relevant date, and the average of yield value and break-up value could not be used. A separate deduction for bonus-shares cost was disallowed on the facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>