<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (7) TMI 188 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69389</link>
    <description>Dissolution of a firm and distribution of its assets to a successor company was treated, under the law then applicable, as not amounting to a transfer for capital gains purposes under sections 2(47), 45 and 47(ii). Later amendments expanding the concept of transfer were noted as inapplicable to the assessment year considered, and revaluation or a subsequent share transfer did not change the legal character of the dissolution. Section 41(2) was also inapplicable because the depreciable assets were not sold or transferred in a manner attracting that charge, so no notional profit could be taxed merely because the business continued through a company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 14:53:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (7) TMI 188 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69389</link>
      <description>Dissolution of a firm and distribution of its assets to a successor company was treated, under the law then applicable, as not amounting to a transfer for capital gains purposes under sections 2(47), 45 and 47(ii). Later amendments expanding the concept of transfer were noted as inapplicable to the assessment year considered, and revaluation or a subsequent share transfer did not change the legal character of the dissolution. Section 41(2) was also inapplicable because the depreciable assets were not sold or transferred in a manner attracting that charge, so no notional profit could be taxed merely because the business continued through a company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>