<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (7) TMI 187 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69388</link>
    <description>The valuation of the flat and vacant site had to follow the wealth-tax value for the year immediately preceding death, and the accountable person&#039;s figures were accepted because the administrative instruction governed the valuation exercise on the facts. The amount set apart for the daughter&#039;s marriage was not deductible as a charge reducing the principal value of the estate, because a charge under section 100 of the Transfer of Property Act does not create an interest in property and the arrangement was a self-created encumbrance arising from a personal obligation. As it was not consideration in money or money&#039;s worth under the Estate Duty Act, it could not be allowed indirectly through estate valuation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 14:52:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (7) TMI 187 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69388</link>
      <description>The valuation of the flat and vacant site had to follow the wealth-tax value for the year immediately preceding death, and the accountable person&#039;s figures were accepted because the administrative instruction governed the valuation exercise on the facts. The amount set apart for the daughter&#039;s marriage was not deductible as a charge reducing the principal value of the estate, because a charge under section 100 of the Transfer of Property Act does not create an interest in property and the arrangement was a self-created encumbrance arising from a personal obligation. As it was not consideration in money or money&#039;s worth under the Estate Duty Act, it could not be allowed indirectly through estate valuation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>