<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (7) TMI 197 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69385</link>
    <description>An appeal lies where an assessment order itself includes interest within the estate duty payable and the objection is directed to that composite determination; the challenge is therefore to the duty assessment, not to a standalone interest levy. Interest under the postponement provision was also not warranted on these facts because the statute authorised instalment payment and interest up to a maximum but prescribed no minimum, and the provisional demand was fully discharged before the first instalment fell due. The interest component was to be excluded from the duty payable, with consequential refund of any excess amount paid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 14:47:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (7) TMI 197 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69385</link>
      <description>An appeal lies where an assessment order itself includes interest within the estate duty payable and the objection is directed to that composite determination; the challenge is therefore to the duty assessment, not to a standalone interest levy. Interest under the postponement provision was also not warranted on these facts because the statute authorised instalment payment and interest up to a maximum but prescribed no minimum, and the provisional demand was fully discharged before the first instalment fell due. The interest component was to be excluded from the duty payable, with consequential refund of any excess amount paid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>