<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (5) TMI 112 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69369</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the orders denying standard deduction were reversed. The Tribunal directed the ITO to allow the standard deduction under s. 16(1) of the IT Act, 1961, based on the partner&#039;s entitlement to remuneration for services rendered to the firm, as established by relevant legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 May 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 14:20:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (5) TMI 112 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69369</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the orders denying standard deduction were reversed. The Tribunal directed the ITO to allow the standard deduction under s. 16(1) of the IT Act, 1961, based on the partner&#039;s entitlement to remuneration for services rendered to the firm, as established by relevant legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 May 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>