<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (9) TMI 140 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69347</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the AAC&#039;s decision that the ITO lacked jurisdiction to impose penalties under section 274(2) of the IT Act, 1961 for assessment years 1966-67 and 1967-68. Relying on a ruling of the Madras High Court and emphasizing the law applicable at the time of concealment, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the AAC&#039;s order and denying penalties based on the amended provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 13:03:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (9) TMI 140 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69347</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the AAC&#039;s decision that the ITO lacked jurisdiction to impose penalties under section 274(2) of the IT Act, 1961 for assessment years 1966-67 and 1967-68. Relying on a ruling of the Madras High Court and emphasizing the law applicable at the time of concealment, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the AAC&#039;s order and denying penalties based on the amended provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>