<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (4) TMI 172 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69341</link>
    <description>The appeals were filed by a firm manufacturing Rubber Gaskets against the orders of the AAC of IT, Coimbatore Range, and CIT (Appeals), Coimbatore for the assessment years 1974-75, 1975-76, 1976-77, and 1977-78. The primary issue was the computation of relief under section 80J. The Tribunal remitted the question back to the ITO for reconsideration. Additionally, in the assessment for the year 1977-78, the Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to interest under section 214 on excess advance-tax paid, directing the ITO to include the tax paid in advance on time and allow interest. Consequently, all four appeals were allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 12:53:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107711" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (4) TMI 172 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69341</link>
      <description>The appeals were filed by a firm manufacturing Rubber Gaskets against the orders of the AAC of IT, Coimbatore Range, and CIT (Appeals), Coimbatore for the assessment years 1974-75, 1975-76, 1976-77, and 1977-78. The primary issue was the computation of relief under section 80J. The Tribunal remitted the question back to the ITO for reconsideration. Additionally, in the assessment for the year 1977-78, the Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to interest under section 214 on excess advance-tax paid, directing the ITO to include the tax paid in advance on time and allow interest. Consequently, all four appeals were allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>