<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (3) TMI 140 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69296</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for rectification, maintaining its original decision that unabsorbed depreciation of the earlier year cannot be set off against the assessee&#039;s income for the current assessment year. The Tribunal explained that at the time of the original order, no Madras High Court judgment was available, and the subsequent agreement by the Madras High Court did not render the issue non-debatable at the time of the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The Tribunal held that the absence of the Madras High Court&#039;s decision earlier did not constitute a mistake apparent from the records, thus upholding its initial ruling on the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 11:22:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (3) TMI 140 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69296</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for rectification, maintaining its original decision that unabsorbed depreciation of the earlier year cannot be set off against the assessee&#039;s income for the current assessment year. The Tribunal explained that at the time of the original order, no Madras High Court judgment was available, and the subsequent agreement by the Madras High Court did not render the issue non-debatable at the time of the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The Tribunal held that the absence of the Madras High Court&#039;s decision earlier did not constitute a mistake apparent from the records, thus upholding its initial ruling on the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>