<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (10) TMI 121 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69285</link>
    <description>Chit kasar paid by a firm to its partners, when received by them as subscribers to the chit scheme and not in their capacity as partners, was treated as outside the scope of section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The payment was characterised as a rebate for participation in the chit and not as interest, salary, remuneration or commission to a partner. On that basis, the statutory disallowance did not apply and the addition of the chit kasar amount was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 11:04:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (10) TMI 121 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69285</link>
      <description>Chit kasar paid by a firm to its partners, when received by them as subscribers to the chit scheme and not in their capacity as partners, was treated as outside the scope of section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The payment was characterised as a rebate for participation in the chit and not as interest, salary, remuneration or commission to a partner. On that basis, the statutory disallowance did not apply and the addition of the chit kasar amount was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>