<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (4) TMI 66 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69278</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that no penalty could be levied under s. 18(1)(c) of the Wealth Tax Act for the assessment years 1957-58 and 1959-60. The Tribunal found no evidence of intentional concealment, considering the complexities in property valuation, the number of properties involved, and confusion caused by municipal actions. It concluded that the revised returns were filed in good faith to rectify valuation discrepancies, leading to the cancellation of penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 10:54:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (4) TMI 66 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69278</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that no penalty could be levied under s. 18(1)(c) of the Wealth Tax Act for the assessment years 1957-58 and 1959-60. The Tribunal found no evidence of intentional concealment, considering the complexities in property valuation, the number of properties involved, and confusion caused by municipal actions. It concluded that the revised returns were filed in good faith to rectify valuation discrepancies, leading to the cancellation of penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>