<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (5) TMI 63 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69271</link>
    <description>The appeal involved the assessment of income for the year 1974-75 as an Association of Persons. The Income Tax Officer considered an unspent balance taxable due to a belated filing of Form No. 10, but the Assistant Commissioner disagreed, stating the deposits in any bank satisfied conditions under section 11(2) (b) (ii), and the form filing was not delayed. The Tribunal ruled that the filing of Form No. 10 on 28th Nov., 1974, was timely, disregarding conflicting rules. It also confirmed the deposit in a bank met requirements for tax exemption, directing the Income Tax Officer to grant exemption if other conditions were met, ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 10:39:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (5) TMI 63 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69271</link>
      <description>The appeal involved the assessment of income for the year 1974-75 as an Association of Persons. The Income Tax Officer considered an unspent balance taxable due to a belated filing of Form No. 10, but the Assistant Commissioner disagreed, stating the deposits in any bank satisfied conditions under section 11(2) (b) (ii), and the form filing was not delayed. The Tribunal ruled that the filing of Form No. 10 on 28th Nov., 1974, was timely, disregarding conflicting rules. It also confirmed the deposit in a bank met requirements for tax exemption, directing the Income Tax Officer to grant exemption if other conditions were met, ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>