<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (3) TMI 95 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69262</link>
    <description>Interest in a partnership firm engaged in systematic handloom saree production was treated as an interest in an industrial undertaking for wealth-tax exemption under section 5(1)(xxxii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The Tribunal noted that the firm purchased yarn and other materials, employed weavers, and carried on organised, continuous manufacturing activity; on that factual basis, the assessee&#039;s claim for exemption was upheld. Authorities relied on by the Revenue were distinguished because they concerned firms not owning looms and materially different facts. The revenue objection therefore failed, and the exemption was maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 10:22:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (3) TMI 95 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69262</link>
      <description>Interest in a partnership firm engaged in systematic handloom saree production was treated as an interest in an industrial undertaking for wealth-tax exemption under section 5(1)(xxxii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The Tribunal noted that the firm purchased yarn and other materials, employed weavers, and carried on organised, continuous manufacturing activity; on that factual basis, the assessee&#039;s claim for exemption was upheld. Authorities relied on by the Revenue were distinguished because they concerned firms not owning looms and materially different facts. The revenue objection therefore failed, and the exemption was maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>