<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (1) TMI 162 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69258</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeals challenging assessment cancellations under s. 143 (3) r/w s. 147 for the asst. yr. 1967-68, jurisdiction of the ITO under s. 171 for the asst. yr. 1973-74 in a HUF partition, and cancellations of assessments on an unregistered firm were dismissed. The AAC&#039;s decisions to cancel assessments were upheld due to lack of jurisdiction and evidence supporting genuine partitions or firm existence. The ITO&#039;s actions were deemed invalid, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 10:15:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (1) TMI 162 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69258</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeals challenging assessment cancellations under s. 143 (3) r/w s. 147 for the asst. yr. 1967-68, jurisdiction of the ITO under s. 171 for the asst. yr. 1973-74 in a HUF partition, and cancellations of assessments on an unregistered firm were dismissed. The AAC&#039;s decisions to cancel assessments were upheld due to lack of jurisdiction and evidence supporting genuine partitions or firm existence. The ITO&#039;s actions were deemed invalid, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>