<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (2) TMI 143 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69245</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s decisions on all contested points. The Tribunal emphasized the proper interpretation of the cost of acquisition for capital gains, the nature of perquisites under Section 40A(5), and the characterization of routine business expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 09:52:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (2) TMI 143 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69245</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s decisions on all contested points. The Tribunal emphasized the proper interpretation of the cost of acquisition for capital gains, the nature of perquisites under Section 40A(5), and the characterization of routine business expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>