<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (9) TMI 52 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69214</link>
    <description>Composite contracts for design, fabrication, delivery, erection, commissioning and testing of conveyor systems were treated as works contracts because the materials were manufactured to specification, fixed to the site and intended to pass only on completion of installation. The presence of on-site fitting, testing, acceptance procedures, retention money, maintenance obligations and close supervision showed that the dominant intention was execution of an integrated installation contract rather than sale of movable goods. On that basis, the turnover arising from the conveyor contracts was not exigible to sales tax as first sales of goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:35:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (9) TMI 52 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69214</link>
      <description>Composite contracts for design, fabrication, delivery, erection, commissioning and testing of conveyor systems were treated as works contracts because the materials were manufactured to specification, fixed to the site and intended to pass only on completion of installation. The presence of on-site fitting, testing, acceptance procedures, retention money, maintenance obligations and close supervision showed that the dominant intention was execution of an integrated installation contract rather than sale of movable goods. On that basis, the turnover arising from the conveyor contracts was not exigible to sales tax as first sales of goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>