<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (2) TMI 77 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69186</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(a) was not leviable where the assessee showed reasonable cause for delay in filing the return. The explanation accepted on the facts was that business decline, heavy losses, creditor pressure, ill health, lack of assistance, and staff departure prevented timely filing, and the delay was treated as arising from circumstances beyond the assessee&#039;s control. On that basis, the penalty was held not exigible and was cancelled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:32:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (2) TMI 77 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69186</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(a) was not leviable where the assessee showed reasonable cause for delay in filing the return. The explanation accepted on the facts was that business decline, heavy losses, creditor pressure, ill health, lack of assistance, and staff departure prevented timely filing, and the delay was treated as arising from circumstances beyond the assessee&#039;s control. On that basis, the penalty was held not exigible and was cancelled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>