<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 277 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69170</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that properties owned by the assessee company could be charged to wealth-tax if they exceeded the specified unbuilt area. Debts could only be deducted if incurred in relation to the taxable assets. Valuation should be based on market value or DVO&#039;s estimation, considering any development agreements or restrictions. The appeals were adjudicated accordingly, with some issues set aside for re-examination by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 10:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 277 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69170</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that properties owned by the assessee company could be charged to wealth-tax if they exceeded the specified unbuilt area. Debts could only be deducted if incurred in relation to the taxable assets. Valuation should be based on market value or DVO&#039;s estimation, considering any development agreements or restrictions. The appeals were adjudicated accordingly, with some issues set aside for re-examination by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69170</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>