<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 317 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69169</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the penalty under section 271D for contravening section 269SS. The assessee failed to demonstrate a reasonable cause for accepting cash loans exceeding Rs. 20,000, and the genuineness of the loans did not exempt them from compliance. The loans from agriculturists were not exempt as the assessee had taxable income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2024 10:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 317 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69169</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the penalty under section 271D for contravening section 269SS. The assessee failed to demonstrate a reasonable cause for accepting cash loans exceeding Rs. 20,000, and the genuineness of the loans did not exempt them from compliance. The loans from agriculturists were not exempt as the assessee had taxable income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>