<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 128 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69167</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, by majority view, allowed the appeal of the assessee, quashing the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The decision emphasized the necessity of invoking the Explanation to Section 271(1)(c) at the earliest stage and ensuring that penalty proceedings are conducted in strict compliance with legal provisions and judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 15:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 128 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69167</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, by majority view, allowed the appeal of the assessee, quashing the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The decision emphasized the necessity of invoking the Explanation to Section 271(1)(c) at the earliest stage and ensuring that penalty proceedings are conducted in strict compliance with legal provisions and judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>