<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 193 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69143</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the Commissioner (A) erred in not considering the assessee&#039;s request for exemption from the operation of section 249(4) based on financial difficulties. The Tribunal directed the Commissioner (A) to admit the appeal and dispose of it on merits, considering the financial difficulty as a good and sufficient reason for exemption. The appeal was thus restored to the file of the Commissioner (A) for disposal on merits. The appeal by the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:59:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107515" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 193 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69143</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the Commissioner (A) erred in not considering the assessee&#039;s request for exemption from the operation of section 249(4) based on financial difficulties. The Tribunal directed the Commissioner (A) to admit the appeal and dispose of it on merits, considering the financial difficulty as a good and sufficient reason for exemption. The appeal was thus restored to the file of the Commissioner (A) for disposal on merits. The appeal by the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>