<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (9) TMI 202 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69115</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the transfer of assets from the partnership firm to the partners did not constitute a taxable event under section 41(2) or capital gains under section 45 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It determined that the assets belonged solely to the two partners and not the firm, based on the partnership deeds and provisions of the Partnership Act. The Tribunal also emphasized that a partnership firm cannot own property separately from its partners, and any distribution of assets among partners is not considered a transfer requiring a registered instrument. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 12:31:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (9) TMI 202 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69115</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the transfer of assets from the partnership firm to the partners did not constitute a taxable event under section 41(2) or capital gains under section 45 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It determined that the assets belonged solely to the two partners and not the firm, based on the partnership deeds and provisions of the Partnership Act. The Tribunal also emphasized that a partnership firm cannot own property separately from its partners, and any distribution of assets among partners is not considered a transfer requiring a registered instrument. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>