<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (6) TMI 118 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69091</link>
    <description>The appellate authorities concluded that the unaccounted profits revealed by the seized documents could not be added to the income of the assessee-firm. They found inconsistencies in the statements made by the partner and noted insufficient evidence to establish the firm&#039;s involvement in unaccounted transactions. The majority view, supported by the Judicial Member and the Third Member, was to dismiss the revenue&#039;s appeals, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee-firm.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 11:20:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (6) TMI 118 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69091</link>
      <description>The appellate authorities concluded that the unaccounted profits revealed by the seized documents could not be added to the income of the assessee-firm. They found inconsistencies in the statements made by the partner and noted insufficient evidence to establish the firm&#039;s involvement in unaccounted transactions. The majority view, supported by the Judicial Member and the Third Member, was to dismiss the revenue&#039;s appeals, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee-firm.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>