<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (2) TMI 164 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69053</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee is entitled to carry forward the unabsorbed investment allowance even in loss years, aligning with the legislative intent to provide investment incentives. Additionally, the Tribunal found the Commissioner of Income-tax&#039;s revision orders invalid as they were time-barred, ultimately setting aside the orders and restoring the Assessing Officer&#039;s original assessments, thereby allowing the assessee&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 17:50:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107425" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (2) TMI 164 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69053</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee is entitled to carry forward the unabsorbed investment allowance even in loss years, aligning with the legislative intent to provide investment incentives. Additionally, the Tribunal found the Commissioner of Income-tax&#039;s revision orders invalid as they were time-barred, ultimately setting aside the orders and restoring the Assessing Officer&#039;s original assessments, thereby allowing the assessee&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>