<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (10) TMI 104 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69052</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the genuine nature of the transaction, the absence of tax evasion motives, and compliance with legal requirements. The tribunal deleted the assessments of capital gains and profit under section 41(2), aligning with Supreme Court precedents and emphasizing the legitimacy of the transaction due to financial institution requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (10) TMI 104 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69052</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the genuine nature of the transaction, the absence of tax evasion motives, and compliance with legal requirements. The tribunal deleted the assessments of capital gains and profit under section 41(2), aligning with Supreme Court precedents and emphasizing the legitimacy of the transaction due to financial institution requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69052</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>