<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (7) TMI 156 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69047</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the capital gains component of the insurance money was not taxable and that the scrap value realized from the sale of scrap was not taxable as capital gains. However, it ruled that section 41(2) profits from the insurance money and the insurance money attributable to the stock of tea destroyed were taxable. The issue of interest under sections 214 and 215 was deemed consequential. As a result, the assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (7) TMI 156 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69047</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the capital gains component of the insurance money was not taxable and that the scrap value realized from the sale of scrap was not taxable as capital gains. However, it ruled that section 41(2) profits from the insurance money and the insurance money attributable to the stock of tea destroyed were taxable. The issue of interest under sections 214 and 215 was deemed consequential. As a result, the assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>