<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (8) TMI 208 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69039</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s assessment of the income from property at Rs. 7,20,000, rejecting the assessee&#039;s claims for bifurcating the income and deducting interest on borrowed capital. The decision emphasized the inseparability of the building and amenities, the inclusion of interest saved as part of the income, and the tax implications of the assessee&#039;s chosen financial arrangements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (8) TMI 208 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69039</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s assessment of the income from property at Rs. 7,20,000, rejecting the assessee&#039;s claims for bifurcating the income and deducting interest on borrowed capital. The decision emphasized the inseparability of the building and amenities, the inclusion of interest saved as part of the income, and the tax implications of the assessee&#039;s chosen financial arrangements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>