<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (2) TMI 124 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69025</link>
    <description>A proprietary business reconstituted into a partnership by admitting family members and reducing the proprietor&#039;s profit share was treated as non-taxable because the incoming partners contributed capital, undertook further funding, and assumed profit-and-loss sharing, showing real commercial consideration rather than a gratuitous transfer. The arrangement was also held to fall within the business-purpose exemption under section 5(1)(xiv) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958, because it was bona fide, supported by consideration in money or money&#039;s worth, and entered into for business assistance, continuity, and expansion. The transaction was therefore regarded as neither a gift nor a deemed gift.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 15:56:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (2) TMI 124 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69025</link>
      <description>A proprietary business reconstituted into a partnership by admitting family members and reducing the proprietor&#039;s profit share was treated as non-taxable because the incoming partners contributed capital, undertook further funding, and assumed profit-and-loss sharing, showing real commercial consideration rather than a gratuitous transfer. The arrangement was also held to fall within the business-purpose exemption under section 5(1)(xiv) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958, because it was bona fide, supported by consideration in money or money&#039;s worth, and entered into for business assistance, continuity, and expansion. The transaction was therefore regarded as neither a gift nor a deemed gift.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>