<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (6) TMI 110 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68994</link>
    <description>Interest credited by a firm to the account of a deceased partner&#039;s estate was examined under section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. On the death of the intestate partner, succession vested immediately in the Class I heirs, who took definite one-fifth shares as tenants-in-common under the Hindu Succession Act; their continued joint enjoyment of an undivided estate did not make them a body of individuals or an association of persons. As each heir had a defined share, the interest relatable to the partner-heirs was treated as interest payable to partners and attracted section 40(b). The four-fifths disallowance was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:54:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (6) TMI 110 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68994</link>
      <description>Interest credited by a firm to the account of a deceased partner&#039;s estate was examined under section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. On the death of the intestate partner, succession vested immediately in the Class I heirs, who took definite one-fifth shares as tenants-in-common under the Hindu Succession Act; their continued joint enjoyment of an undivided estate did not make them a body of individuals or an association of persons. As each heir had a defined share, the interest relatable to the partner-heirs was treated as interest payable to partners and attracted section 40(b). The four-fifths disallowance was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>