<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (8) TMI 145 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68986</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT MADRAS-A ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the withdrawal of investment allowance by the ITO under section 155(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The case involved the utilization of the investment allowance for acquiring new plant and machinery, succession of business, and the interpretation of conditions for the grant of investment allowance. The Tribunal held that despite the dissolution of the firm and no acquisition of new machinery in a specific year, the assessee was considered the successor to the business, exempting the withdrawal of the investment allowance. The decision upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (8) TMI 145 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68986</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT MADRAS-A ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the withdrawal of investment allowance by the ITO under section 155(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The case involved the utilization of the investment allowance for acquiring new plant and machinery, succession of business, and the interpretation of conditions for the grant of investment allowance. The Tribunal held that despite the dissolution of the firm and no acquisition of new machinery in a specific year, the assessee was considered the successor to the business, exempting the withdrawal of the investment allowance. The decision upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>