<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (12) TMI 89 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68965</link>
    <description>Deduction under section 80HH was held to be computed on the profits derived from the new industrial undertaking for the relevant year, before setting off carried-forward losses and prior year allowances, because the provision was treated as a beneficial Chapter VIA incentive and section 80AB was not read as altering that position for the year in question. Expenditure on name boards supplied to dealers was treated as publicity for the assessee&#039;s products and therefore as advertisement expenditure, so the disallowance under section 37(3A) was sustained. The assessee obtained relief on the section 80HH computation issue but failed on the name-board expenditure issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 12:24:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (12) TMI 89 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68965</link>
      <description>Deduction under section 80HH was held to be computed on the profits derived from the new industrial undertaking for the relevant year, before setting off carried-forward losses and prior year allowances, because the provision was treated as a beneficial Chapter VIA incentive and section 80AB was not read as altering that position for the year in question. Expenditure on name boards supplied to dealers was treated as publicity for the assessee&#039;s products and therefore as advertisement expenditure, so the disallowance under section 37(3A) was sustained. The assessee obtained relief on the section 80HH computation issue but failed on the name-board expenditure issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>