<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (10) TMI 96 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68960</link>
    <description>Section 4(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 applies only when the revenue establishes that property was transferred otherwise than for adequate consideration and that the facts justify the deeming fiction. A departmental valuation report is only expert evidence of persuasive value and does not, by itself, prove market value or inadequate consideration. On the facts, the transfer was treated as a bona fide business transaction, and no material showed any attempt to evade gift-tax. The mere difference between declared price and valuation was therefore insufficient to treat the excess as a deemed gift, and the gift-tax addition was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 12:10:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (10) TMI 96 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68960</link>
      <description>Section 4(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 applies only when the revenue establishes that property was transferred otherwise than for adequate consideration and that the facts justify the deeming fiction. A departmental valuation report is only expert evidence of persuasive value and does not, by itself, prove market value or inadequate consideration. On the facts, the transfer was treated as a bona fide business transaction, and no material showed any attempt to evade gift-tax. The mere difference between declared price and valuation was therefore insufficient to treat the excess as a deemed gift, and the gift-tax addition was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>