<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 481 - ITAT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68947</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed in a case involving the deletion of an addition of Rs. 1.5 crores made under section 69C of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal held that the unexplained stock value could not be included as purchases in the final account, and the assessee was not entitled to claim it as a deduction. Therefore, the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) was reversed, and that of the Assessing Officer was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 481 - ITAT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68947</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed in a case involving the deletion of an addition of Rs. 1.5 crores made under section 69C of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal held that the unexplained stock value could not be included as purchases in the final account, and the assessee was not entitled to claim it as a deduction. Therefore, the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) was reversed, and that of the Assessing Officer was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>