<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (1) TMI 45 - ITAT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68863</link>
    <description>Receipts from rewinding, repairing, reconditioning and rebuilding of commutators, armatures and similar items were examined to determine whether they arose from manufacture-based sales or from works contracts. The record showed that the assessee processed customer-supplied goods under bills and correspondence describing the activity as repair or return of entrusted articles, and it did not show emergence of a commercially different product. The revenue also failed to prove by inspection or other evidence that new manufactured goods came into existence. Applying the test that manufacture requires a distinct commercial commodity, the receipts were treated as labour-and-material based works contract receipts, not taxable sales from manufacture.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 11:25:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (1) TMI 45 - ITAT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68863</link>
      <description>Receipts from rewinding, repairing, reconditioning and rebuilding of commutators, armatures and similar items were examined to determine whether they arose from manufacture-based sales or from works contracts. The record showed that the assessee processed customer-supplied goods under bills and correspondence describing the activity as repair or return of entrusted articles, and it did not show emergence of a commercially different product. The revenue also failed to prove by inspection or other evidence that new manufactured goods came into existence. Applying the test that manufacture requires a distinct commercial commodity, the receipts were treated as labour-and-material based works contract receipts, not taxable sales from manufacture.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>