<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 272 - ITAT LUCKNOW-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68828</link>
    <description>The appeal by the revenue was partly allowed, restoring the penalty in respect of the gift from Shri Vimlesh Kumar, while the penalty in respect of the other two gifts was canceled. The cross-objection filed by the assessee was dismissed, upholding the validity of the penalty proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 18:48:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 272 - ITAT LUCKNOW-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68828</link>
      <description>The appeal by the revenue was partly allowed, restoring the penalty in respect of the gift from Shri Vimlesh Kumar, while the penalty in respect of the other two gifts was canceled. The cross-objection filed by the assessee was dismissed, upholding the validity of the penalty proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>