<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 361 - ITAT LUCKNOW-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68824</link>
    <description>Section 50C operates as a special deeming rule for capital gains computation in immovable property transfers: where declared sale consideration is lower than the stamp valuation, the stamp value is treated as the full value of consideration under section 48. If the assessee objects, the AO may seek a DVO valuation under section 50C(2); however, where that valuation exceeds the stamp value, section 50C(3) requires adoption of the stamp valuation. An approved valuer&#039;s report does not override this statutory mechanism, and the AO has no discretion to ignore the stamp value where the legal conditions are met. The addition based on stamp valuation was therefore sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2024 14:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 361 - ITAT LUCKNOW-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68824</link>
      <description>Section 50C operates as a special deeming rule for capital gains computation in immovable property transfers: where declared sale consideration is lower than the stamp valuation, the stamp value is treated as the full value of consideration under section 48. If the assessee objects, the AO may seek a DVO valuation under section 50C(2); however, where that valuation exceeds the stamp value, section 50C(3) requires adoption of the stamp valuation. An approved valuer&#039;s report does not override this statutory mechanism, and the AO has no discretion to ignore the stamp value where the legal conditions are met. The addition based on stamp valuation was therefore sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>