<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 324 - ITAT LUCKNOW-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68820</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee as it quashed the reassessment proceedings due to the lack of adequate reasons and material for reopening the assessment under section 148. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer did not have sufficient information to infer that the interest payment was excessive, leading to the reassessment being quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 18:24:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 324 - ITAT LUCKNOW-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68820</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee as it quashed the reassessment proceedings due to the lack of adequate reasons and material for reopening the assessment under section 148. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer did not have sufficient information to infer that the interest payment was excessive, leading to the reassessment being quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>