<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 321 - ITAT LUCKNOW-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68812</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to annul the assessment order due to improper service of notice under section 143(2) of the IT Act, 1961. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as it failed to prove timely service of the notice within the prescribed period, as required by legal precedents. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of adhering to the statutory timeline for serving notices and concluded that the assessment order was not in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 321 - ITAT LUCKNOW-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68812</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to annul the assessment order due to improper service of notice under section 143(2) of the IT Act, 1961. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as it failed to prove timely service of the notice within the prescribed period, as required by legal precedents. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of adhering to the statutory timeline for serving notices and concluded that the assessment order was not in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68812</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>