<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 252 - ITAT LUCKNOW-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68803</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, deleting the additions made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A) under section 40A(3) of the IT Act for AY 1992-93 and AY 1991-92. The Tribunal found that the payments were made under exceptional circumstances as per relevant provisions and circulars, emphasizing that genuine transactions should not be disallowed, in line with judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 17:26:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 252 - ITAT LUCKNOW-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68803</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, deleting the additions made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A) under section 40A(3) of the IT Act for AY 1992-93 and AY 1991-92. The Tribunal found that the payments were made under exceptional circumstances as per relevant provisions and circulars, emphasizing that genuine transactions should not be disallowed, in line with judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>