<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 282 - ITAT LUCKNOW-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68785</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee&#039;s voluntary surrender of income, supported by substantial evidence, did not amount to concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming that the penalty was not justified in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 282 - ITAT LUCKNOW-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68785</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee&#039;s voluntary surrender of income, supported by substantial evidence, did not amount to concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming that the penalty was not justified in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>