<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 466 - ITAT LUCKNOW-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68781</link>
    <description>Exemption under section 5(1)(iib) of the Gift-tax Act depended on whether the assessee qualified as a &quot;person resident outside India&quot; under section 2(q) of FERA. The applicable residence test had to be taken from FERA itself, not from section 6 of the Income-tax Act, because the incorporated definition was to be applied according to its source statute unless the incorporating provision required otherwise. On the facts, the assessee&#039;s stay in India from 6-6-1997 satisfied the FERA residency test based on intention to stay for an uncertain period, so the Income-tax Act day-counting rule and any special gift-date cut-off were rejected. The exemption was therefore unavailable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 14:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 466 - ITAT LUCKNOW-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68781</link>
      <description>Exemption under section 5(1)(iib) of the Gift-tax Act depended on whether the assessee qualified as a &quot;person resident outside India&quot; under section 2(q) of FERA. The applicable residence test had to be taken from FERA itself, not from section 6 of the Income-tax Act, because the incorporated definition was to be applied according to its source statute unless the incorporating provision required otherwise. On the facts, the assessee&#039;s stay in India from 6-6-1997 satisfied the FERA residency test based on intention to stay for an uncertain period, so the Income-tax Act day-counting rule and any special gift-date cut-off were rejected. The exemption was therefore unavailable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>