<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 260 - ITAT LUCKNOW-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68779</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessment orders for both assessment years due to the invalid service of notice under Section 148. It held that proper service of notice is a jurisdictional requirement and cannot be cured by the assessee&#039;s participation in the proceedings. Consequently, the appeals filed by the assessee were allowed, and those filed by the Department were dismissed as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 May 2016 14:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 260 - ITAT LUCKNOW-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68779</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessment orders for both assessment years due to the invalid service of notice under Section 148. It held that proper service of notice is a jurisdictional requirement and cannot be cured by the assessee&#039;s participation in the proceedings. Consequently, the appeals filed by the assessee were allowed, and those filed by the Department were dismissed as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>