<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 267 - ITAT LUCKNOW-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68776</link>
    <description>Section 184(5) is attracted only where there is a complete failure of the kind contemplated by section 144; mere non-cooperation or partial non-compliance may justify best judgment assessment, but it does not by itself convert a genuine firm into an association of persons. In the contractor business, an 8% net profit estimate was treated as a reasonable and supported estimate, while a 10% rate applied without material was not upheld. For partners&#039; capital contributions, the absence of confirmations or full supporting records in the first year did not, by itself, justify treating the amounts as unexplained cash credits where the surrounding circumstances did not show undisclosed income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2024 11:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 267 - ITAT LUCKNOW-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68776</link>
      <description>Section 184(5) is attracted only where there is a complete failure of the kind contemplated by section 144; mere non-cooperation or partial non-compliance may justify best judgment assessment, but it does not by itself convert a genuine firm into an association of persons. In the contractor business, an 8% net profit estimate was treated as a reasonable and supported estimate, while a 10% rate applied without material was not upheld. For partners&#039; capital contributions, the absence of confirmations or full supporting records in the first year did not, by itself, justify treating the amounts as unexplained cash credits where the surrounding circumstances did not show undisclosed income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>