<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 240 - ITAT LUCKNOW-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68771</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263, ruling it was without jurisdiction as the original assessment under Section 148/143(3) was void. It found the reassessment proceedings under Section 148/147 illegal and void due to lack of basis. The Tribunal also held that the addition of undisclosed income based on the VDIS declaration was unjustified and that Section 69A was inapplicable. Both appeals filed by the assessee were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 240 - ITAT LUCKNOW-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68771</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263, ruling it was without jurisdiction as the original assessment under Section 148/143(3) was void. It found the reassessment proceedings under Section 148/147 illegal and void due to lack of basis. The Tribunal also held that the addition of undisclosed income based on the VDIS declaration was unjustified and that Section 69A was inapplicable. Both appeals filed by the assessee were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>