<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 251 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68762</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals filed by the assessee. The additions made under Section 68 on account of share application money, deposits by individuals, and bonus payment were deleted. The Tribunal held that the assessee had discharged its burden of proving the identity and receipt of payments from the shareholders and depositors, and no further inquiry was required.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 13:14:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 251 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68762</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals filed by the assessee. The additions made under Section 68 on account of share application money, deposits by individuals, and bonus payment were deleted. The Tribunal held that the assessee had discharged its burden of proving the identity and receipt of payments from the shareholders and depositors, and no further inquiry was required.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>