<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 239 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68755</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals by deleting additions of Rs. 4,36,480, Rs. 6,48,000, and Rs. 1,40,000, while restoring the issue of Rs. 60,000 to the AO for reconsideration. Challenges to the validity of the notice and the opportunity provided to the assessee were rejected. The findings in ITA No. 1559/All/1994 were applied mutatis mutandis to the other two appeals, which were also partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 12:46:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 239 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68755</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals by deleting additions of Rs. 4,36,480, Rs. 6,48,000, and Rs. 1,40,000, while restoring the issue of Rs. 60,000 to the AO for reconsideration. Challenges to the validity of the notice and the opportunity provided to the assessee were rejected. The findings in ITA No. 1559/All/1994 were applied mutatis mutandis to the other two appeals, which were also partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>